Amirali R. Davoudpour
Iranian Canon of Medicine and Law, Administrative Wing of Law and Healing association, Iranian Watchdog of Medicine and Law, Tehran-Iran
Email of the corresponding author: davoudpour@canmedlaw.org
Accepted and published July, 2024 , DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13187695
This article is published under CC BY creative common license that Allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the original creator.
Abstract
The opposition to the Islamic Republic of Iran can be categorized based on their motivations and reasons for dissent. This categorization differs from that of opponents to Iranian nationalism and the Iranian identity, but the two can often overlap. Critics of Iran’s identity may use similar justifications to undermine the critical infrastructures built by the nation’s youth and the achievements of its self-sufficiency. At first glance, it seems that transitioning away from the Islamic Republic is necessary. However, the Islamic Republic is a product of the wounds and suffering inflicted upon the Middle East by crimes against humanity and international Zionism.
Keywords: Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran, Israel, Reforms, Zionism