Amirali R. Davoudpour
Iranian Canon of Medicine and Law, Administrative Wing of Law and Healing Association, Iranian Watchdog of Medicine and Law, Tehran-Iran
Email of the corresponding author: davoudpour@canmedlaw.org
Accepted and published November, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14062439
This article is published under CC BY 4.0 creative common license that Allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the original creator.
Abstract
Following the Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023, multiple companies, individuals, and universities voiced their support for Israel, condemning the act of terrorism and extending humanitarian aid. This article analyzes the response of various entities, examining their public statements, donations, and support initiatives for Israel, especially in the context of the ongoing legal battle brought before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). South Africa v. Israel, a case filed on December 29, 2023, accuses Israel of violations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide due to its actions in Gaza during the Israel–Hamas war. The article explores the responses to these allegations and the broader political and ethical implications of support for Israel in a time of heightened scrutiny. Those voices mainly remained silent or provided further support for Israel against the convention of Genocide. This article raises concerns and awareness about the people and entities who are willingly complicit in the criminal acts against humanity.
Keywords: Israel, Genocide, Crime against humanity